Neil Remington Abramson commented as follows:

In human discourse, there is too much potential to alienate all sides. I suppose it is Taoist to assert that the Tao (everything) is one and that it is only people that arbitrarily divide it into opposites and apposites (though I think I first read something like this in Werner Stark’s Sociology of Knowledge).

Therefore, there would be no sides except the whole. But who would believe that?

When I was a Unitarian, we were encouraged to develop our own theology. I especially favoured Taoism. I even applied it to my chess playing and won a match against a candidate master friend of mine. It was the rubber game of four.

Alienating all sides, no doubt.

This was before I discovered Christianity.

About brucelarochelle
This entry was posted in Philosophy, Sociology, Taoism, Unitarianism. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s