Burdens of Proof in Accounting Standards

Started to develop this in 1987:

87 Conference Paper – Burdens of Proof in CICA Handbook

Paper presented at conference of the Canadian Academic Accounting Association. As a fake professor at the time, needed guidance as to follow-up, and didn’t.

Basic idea that since the establishment of accounting standards involves delegated legislative authority, such standards need to be interpreted from a legal perspective, where there are two basic burdens of proof: beyond reasonable doubt, and balance of probabilities. Found that, at the time, most Canadian accounting standards were of the balance of probabilities variety. This means 50% plus 1, not 80%.

Yet in the recent criminal trial of the Nortel executives, relating to the appropriate treatment of accruals, there was testimony as to some 70% or so range.

All of the executives were acquitted. Accounting standard-setters, with their delegated legislative authority, do not establish their own burden of proof.

So, nearly thirty years later…


About brucelarochelle

This entry was posted in Accounting Issues, Community of Scholars. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s